Alternative Law Journal

Abstracts, August 2003

Line Image

Volume 28, No 4, August 2003

If I were Attorney General ...

 

Articles

If I were Attorney General

Other articles

 

Briefs

 

Articles

In this issue some invited writers put forward their thought-provoking manifestos for change.

Making Australia a green and pleasant land
by John Corkill

If John Corkill were Attorney General he would overhaul national environmental laws so they were consistent with the real concerns about the environment held by many mainstream Australians.

Attorney General, Chief Law Officer of the Crown: But where is the law?
by Rebecca La Forgia

The government has recently introduced bold strategies to circumvent the rule of law. These include the Pacific Solution where asylum seekers are processed off shore to avoid judicial review by the High Court and excising areas such as Christmas Island from the migration zone thereby creating a legal vacuum for asylum seekers. This article explores this deliberate retreat from the rule of law and suggests that the Attorney-General's role, as chief law officer of the Crown, should be to advocate against this strategy and work to achieve ministerial aims within the rule of law.

Stop undermining human rights
by Natasha Stott Despoja

Natasha Stott Despoja would adopt an entirely different approach to the current Attorney General. Rather than introducing legislation designed to undermine human rights in Australia, she would initiate measures to strengthen their protection.

Restoring liberty, fairness and good legal practice
by Eva Cox

Eva Cox puts forward a social change activist's program of remedial action for the Attorney General.

Legal theory and law reform: Some mainstream and critical approaches
by Margaret Davies

Legal philosophy is sometimes regarded as an abstract intellectual activity which has little to do with the practicalities of law, including the practicalities of law reform. This article considers some of the contributions legal philosophers have made to law reform including some of the concerns which critical legal scholars have held about law as a central mechanism for achieving social change. The author's intention is to begin to make a case for legal theory which directly promotes an interest in the questions of legal change and law reform, without discarding its more "abstract" concerns. Law reform ought to be undertaken reflectively in the context of other, more fundamental, transitions, such as transitions in social and political discourses. Of equal interest to a legal theorist is the view that law reform ought also to be undertaken in the context of transitions in how law is understood conceptually. Law reform is in many contexts limited as an instrument of change. It must be coupled with an emphasis on social change and change in the way law is perceived, in order that fundamental shifts can occur.

Applying therapeutic jurisprudence from the Bench: Challenges and opportunities
by Michael King

Therapeutic jurisprudence explores the law's healing potential. It is commonly associated with problem-solving courts such as drug courts and domestic violence courts. However, therapeutic jurisprudence is relevant to the work of all judicial officers for it asserts that legal processes can be designed to enhance the wellbeing of participants and thereby promote a more comprehensive resolution of legal problems and greater litigant satisfaction with the justice system..

Crusingforsex.com: An empirical critique of the evidentiary practices of the Australian Refugee Review Tribunal
by Catherine Dauvergne and Jenni Millbank

The evidentiary practices of tribunals, rather than the courts, are vital to asylum outcomes as it is in tribunals that the vast majority of cases are finally determined. In the course of a six-year comparative study of over 300 refugee tribunal decisions made in Canada and Australia, the authors found the evidentiary practices and procedures developed by the Australian Refugee Review Tribunal operating at such a routinely low standard that they contribute to decisions that are manifestly unfair and potentially wrong in law. Evidence was often poor in quality and inappropriately utilised by decision makers. Inappropriate uses of evidence included: a markedly gender-blind approach to evidence, selective editing and use of available evidence, and an indiscriminate approach to questions of weight and relevance of evidence.

Consumer Affairs - The Cinderella of government policy making
by Simon Smith

The consumer protection achievements of the 1970s have been undermined by shifts in market regulation and withdrawal of state resources in the 1990s. This article calls for a radical return to prioritised consumer protection at the national level, from consumer policy through consumer credit and product safety to more accountable ADR schemes and consumer protection agencies

Degraded site, degraded law
by Jeremy Tager

This article examines an Administrative Appeals Tribunal judgment relating to a coastal development approval at Nelly Bay, Magnetic Island, North Queensland. In particular it examines the manner in which the AAT relied on the previous degradation of the site as the foundation both for findings of fact and determinations of law. The article examines the implications of the judgment and the 'degraded site' argument for other coastal developments.

 

Briefs

Asylum seekers: Australia and Europe - worlds apart
by Jane McAdam

Australia is the only western country with a mandatory detention regime for unlawful asylum seekers. This article contrasts Australia's policy of mandatory detention with procedures in Europe, where detention is exceptional and employed for specific purposes and limited periods of time. It examines the effect which a proposed Directive will have on harmonising European laws on detention, further emphasising the divide between Australian and European approaches.

Vanuatu: Determining chiefly title: from courts to custom and back again
by Miranda Forsyth

This Brief analyses the recent judgment of the Vanuatu Supreme Court in Chief Waya Tenene and Saul Kalmarie v Kalmetabil Kalmet Nmak (Civil Case No. 203 of 2002, 25 June 2003). The case concerns a dispute over chiefly title, and the ruling demonstrates judicial innovation in attempting to synthesise the courts and traditional dispute resolution processes; as well as raising issues regarding the relationship of the courts, the common law and custom.

Torrens Title: Karl Marx and Australian land titles
by Justice J.W. Shaw

This Brief reports on a little known connection between Australia and 'Das Kapital'..

Voluntarism: Ambition or service? Peter Costello on civil society
by Graeme Orr

This Brief ponders the vision of civil society articulated by the Deputy Prime Minister Peter Costello.

 

| Back to Past Editions | Back to Alt LJ Home Page |

Line Image

Comments or suggestions on the pages to Liz.Boulton@law.monash.edu.au Blue Ribbon Campaign Image